Corrigendum for <scp>PM</scp> 7/149 (1) <i>Anoplophora glabripennis</i> and <i>Anoplophora chinensis</i>

EPPO BulletinEarly View CORRIGENDUMFree Access Corrigendum for PM 7/149 (1) Anoplophora glabripennis and chinensis This article corrects the following: Volume 51Issue 3EPPO Bulletin pages: 568-586 First Published online: November 25, 2021 published: 06 January 2023 https://doi.org/10.1111/epp.12906AboutSectionsPDF ToolsRequest permissionExport citationAdd to favoritesTrack citation ShareShare Give accessShare full text full-text accessPlease review our Terms Conditions of Use check box below share version article.I have read accept Wiley Online Library UseShareable LinkUse link a this with your friends colleagues. Learn more.Copy URL Share linkShare onFacebookTwitterLinkedInRedditWechat Following publication Taddei et al., validation study performed by EURL insects mites, following changes Standard (EPPO, 2021) were proposed approved Panel on Diagnostics in Entomology. Section 4.1.2.2, subsection ‘possible confusion other congeneric species’. In last bullet point subsection, (in bold) Figure 18 should be added illustrate position H3 H4 patches which are used differentiate A. from macularia. macularia elytral fused one large maculation (whereas they separated). For location elytra, see 18. FIGURE 18Open figure viewerPowerPoint Patches pattern elytra Anoplophora; HH = H3, GG (Lingafelter & Hoebeke (2002), modified) Appendix 1 The explanatory bold regarding epipleurum (this word couplet 7 7′) Key identification late instars larvae (after Pennacchio 2012)): * It is not always easy if protuberant or not. will depend preservation mode larvae: larva placed ethanol without boiling, it can shrink appear as even segments; contrary, boiled swell no longer look anymore. Therefore, character carefully observed light characters, before decision made concerning how proceed key. simplified key adult specimens within genus modified followed (modifications bold): Antennae conspicuous pubescent annulations most antennomeres (Figures 12–14) 2 1′ Other species distinct narrow annulation at base apex 2′ basal fourth more 3 Most body covered dense, uniform blue-grey, blue-green turquoise pubescence 3′ uniformly different shades blue (Figure 12) 4 Elytra bands spots dense yellow horsfieldii 4′ otherwise. If yellow, then much smaller forming partial complete 19) 5 Pronotum heavily sculptured posteromedial two mediolateral thickenings integument (= calli), deep middle impression anterior region strongly elevated 5′ very weak calli, margin highly pronounced depression front callus 13A–C) 6 4–7 nearly transverse 6′ maculations form numerous irregularly sized disk, non Elytral (10 more) granules 13B,C) 8 7′ (or 10) 13A) 11 Pubescent poorly defined, fuzzy margined, (about 30), variably bicoloured 8′ less numerous, usually well defined; edges unicolourous (white, orange, blue) 9 few, any, erect suberect, long black hairs; white, translucent ventrally 10 9′ many, davidis 20–40 each, occupying one-fifth 13B,C); antennal white 12C–F) 10′ about each viriantennatus conspicuous, dorsally 11′ 12 Antennomeres broad purple least two-thirds coeruleoantennata 12′ pale than half first scape) 13 shiny, strong metallic copper, green violet sheen; surface short, fine, tarsi neither bright nor iridescent freyi 13′ shiny matte, iridescence; regularly distributed, sparse, hairs along off-white pubescence; fresh bright, 14A); (rarely orange) 12A,B) 19Open (a) (b) nobilis. Courtesy: Andrea (ANSES, FR) new added. section 2.1.2 6th size tube changed. corrected follows (new bold). Collect 500 μL solution, leaving debris bottom transfer 1.5 mL tube. data appendix updated 4.1 Analytical sensitivity Using TaqMan test, 1.0 2.0 pg DNA could detected 100% replicates (9 technical (distributed plates) sample tested). frass samples (Acer saccharinum Aesculus hippocastanum) all until 100-fold dilution initial some 1000-fold dilution. However, was possible determine concentration target organism's because solution contained also plant and, potentially, organisms that colonize wood shavings. 4.2 specificity evaluated panel non-target (larval/adult when available, material). consisted Coleoptera Lepidoptera covering 20 xylophagous (Anoplophora (6), Aromia bungii (8), moschata (1), Morimus asper (2), Saperda carcharias punctata Aegomorphus sp. Penichroa fasciata Cerambyx scopolii Stictoleptura cordigera Rutpela maculata Aegosoma scabricorne Psacothea hilaris Prionus coriarius Xylotrechus Cossus cossus Zeuzera pyrina Synanthedon myopaeformis spuleri Paranthrene tabaniformis (1)) same ecological niche glabripennis, collected host plants belonging genera such Acer, Populus, Ulmus, Prunus, Betula Malus. 16 specimens, known genetic variability Italian outbreaks Magdeburg outbreak (Germany). All tested replicates. No cross reactions observed. REFERENCES A, Becker M, Berger B, Da Lio D, Feltgen S, König Hoppe B Rizzo D (2021) Molecular (Coleoptera: Cerambycidae) detection based real-time quantitative PCR. Journal Plant Diseases Protection. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41348-021-00501-7. chinensis. Bulletin, 51: 568– 586. https://doi.org/10.1111/epp.12797 Early ViewOnline Version Record inclusion an issue FiguresReferencesRelatedInformation